Don't cry for me. Do something NOW!

THE DEAD CHILD UPON THE SHORE
“We men are wretched things.”
― Homer, the Iliad
Dead child upon this shore at Bodrum,
Where did you come from?
Did you flee with your family from Aleppo or Palmyra?
Your face down asleep in death on a wet beach,
Waves coming in from the sea,
Where the dolphins dive and sing,
Where the guts of sunken ships of war lay buried.
Who killed you, child, before you reached this shore?
Bankers, smugglers, or was it politicians?
Was it the Americans, with their lust for oil
in Iraq, that forced your journey?
Was it ISIS, with their demented vision of a Caliphate,
that brought you here near this city
known in the ancient world as Halicarnassus?
One of the Seven Wonders of the World
was famous here,
But the image of you lying peacefully upon the shore
will outlive the memory of Mausoleum of Mausolus,
And your memory will outlive us.
Luis Lázaro Tijerina,, Burlington, Vermont
Drawing by Alissa Gamberg, Burlington,Vermont

Sen. Bernie Sanders: From Greece to Puerto Rico, the Financial Rules Are Rigged to Favor the 1% (democracynow.org)

Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders recently convened a panel of economists in Washington to discuss the debt crisis in Greece and throughout the world. In his opening statement, Sanders talked about the debt crisis in Greece as well as in Puerto Rico. "It is time for creditors to sit down with the governments of Greece and Puerto Rico and work out a debt repayment plan that is fair to both sides," Sanders said. "The people of Greece and the children of Puerto Rico deserve nothing less."

TRANSCRIPT

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: We turn to Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders, who recently convened a panel of economists in Washington to discuss the debt crisis in Greece as well as, well, throughout the world. Senator Sanders said austerity has worsened the situation in Greece. This is some of what he had to say.
SENBERNIE SANDERS: [What] we are here today to talk about is the very, very important issue regarding the ongoing debt crisis in Greece and the way that people and governments all over the world are struggling with too much debt. This is—we’re going to be focusing on Greece, but, in truth, this issue goes beyond Greece. And countries that are struggling not only with too much debt, too much inequality, and too little growth and income.
Today, as I think all of you know, there is a very, very serious economic situation unfolding in Greece. In many ways, Greece today resembles the United States of the 1930s in the midst of the worst depression, economic downturn in the history of our country. The Greek economy has basically collapsed, and the people of Greece are trapped in a very, very deep depression.
I want to begin by expressing my solidarity with the people of Greece, where five years of cruel and counterproductive austerity policies, policies demanded by the European Central Bank, the European Commission and International Monetary Fund, have left the people of Greece facing a full-blown humanitarian crisis. In my view, there is no more obvious example of the failure of austerity policies than what is going on in Greece.
For more than five years, Greece has cut pensions. Greece has slashed its government workforce. Greece has made deep spending cuts that have eviscerated its social safety net. In other words, despite what we have been led to believe by many in the media, Greece has not gone on a shopping spree. It has not overfunded its government. Rather, it has imposed massive spending cuts that have caused devastating pain to some of its most vulnerable people. It has done this because its creditors, led by Germany, have insisted that austerity is the only way to dig Greece out of its debt.
As a result, today, Greece has the highest levels of inequality and the worst unemployment rates in Europe. The official unemployment rate is 26 percent—26 percent. Youth unemployment in Greece today is more than 50 percent. More than 30 percent of the people in Greece are living in poverty. And the Greek economy is 25 percent smaller, has shrunk by 25 percent over the last five years. That is really quite incredible.
Instead of solving the problem, austerity, in my view, has made a bad situation much worse. Greece has seen its debt-to-GDP ratio shoot up from about 120 percent to about 175 percent today. And now to, quote-unquote, "fix" the problem, the troika wants Greece to borrow more money and make deeper cuts to wages, pensions and other social programs.
In January, as you all know, the people of Greece stood up and said, "Enough is enough." They elected a new government, known as Syriza. Their promise: to end the harsh austerity policies—that was their campaign pledge—by increasing their minimum wage, by increasing job production, by protecting the most vulnerable against pension cuts, and ensuring that the wealthiest people in Greece started paying their fair share of taxes, a very serious problem in that country. But instead of working with the new government to find a rational path forward, the troika demanded more austerity than ever.
On July 5th, the people of Greece spoke once again: In an overwhelming show of solidarity with their government, 61 percent of the people of Greece said no to more austerity for the poor, for the children, for the sick and for the elderly. Yet, instead of working with the Greek government on a sensible plan that would allow Greece to improve its economy and pay back its debt, Germany and the troika continued to push Greece to accept even greater austerity.
They want even deeper pension cuts; an increase in the regressive VAT tax from 13 percent to 23 percent; automatic budget cuts if the Greek economy underperforms; privatization of state assets, including the electricity grid; deregulation of the transportation, rail, pharmaceutical and other sectors in the economy; weakening of trade unions. In other words, the people of Greece are being told that their voices, which they cast in two elections, really do not matter, that their misery does not matter, that an entire generation of young people who are unemployed or underemployed does not matter, that the sick and the elderly do not matter, that democracy itself does not matter. And that, to my perspective, is unacceptable.
I believe that this plan is simply unsustainable. In my view, austerity has failed, and continuing with austerity means the Greek economy will continue to fail its people. Unemployment, poverty and inequality will increase from already obscene levels.
And maybe, just maybe, some people are beginning to wake up to this reality. In a confidential report that was made public earlier this month, officials from the IMF warned that the IMF could not take part in any new bailout for Greece unless the Greek government was offered a substantial debt relief package as part of any new deal. In light of this report, it is time for the troika to provide the Greek government with the flexibility it needs to create jobs, raise wages and improve its economy. Without a substantial improvement in its economy, Greece will never escape its debt crisis.
And let us not forget a little bit about history. Let us not forget what happened after World War I, when the Allies imposed oppressive austerity on Germany—on Germany—as part of the Versailles Treaty. And I think all of you who know anything about history understand what happened. And that is, the Germany economy collapsed, unemployed skyrocketed, people were pushing their money around in wheelbarrows to buy a loaf of bread. And the result of all of that massive discontent was that Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party won an election and took power. And you all know the results of that.
What many people do not know about Greece today is that the party that finished third in the Greek—recent Greek election is called Golden Dawn. This is a party which some people call a neo-Nazi party, but other people believe that it is nothing "neo" about it. It is a Nazi party, which came in third place in the recent election. In my view, we should learn from history. And we should understand that when democracy fails, when people vote for something and cannot get what the government promised because of outside forces, this leads to massive discontent, it leads to contempt for democracy, and it opens the path for right-wing extremist parties, like Golden Dawn.
Finally, let us remember that one of the main reasons why Greece was unable to take on so much debt was because it had help from Goldman Sachs, who helped disguise the nature of the Greek debt. Today, when we talk about debt, we should appreciate that something similar is happening right now in Puerto Rico, where the government there is struggling with unsustainable debt, and a group of hedge fund billionaires are demanding austerity in Puerto Rico. They are demanding the firing of teachers, the closing of schools, so that they can reap huge profits off the suffering and misery of the children and the people of Puerto Rico. It is time for creditors to sit down with the governments of Greece and Puerto Rico and work out a debt repayment plan that is fair to both sides. The people of Greece and the children of Puerto Rico deserve nothing less.
Over 70 years ago, the major economic leaders of 44 countries gathered at a hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to establish international economic and financial rules. As a result of that conference, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were established. I think it is clear to anyone who has taken a look at this situation that the rules regarding our international financial system today are rigged in favor of the wealthy and the powerful at the expense of everyone else. Today, 85 of the wealthiest people in this world own more wealth than the bottom half of the world’s population, over 3 billion people. By next year, Oxfam has estimated that the top 1 percent of the world’s population will own more wealth than the bottom 99 percent of the world’s population. In my view, we have got to begin—and I hope this forum today is a start in that process—a serious discussion about how we change our international financial rules to expand—expand economic opportunity and reduce income and wealth inequality, not only in Greece and in Puerto Rico, but throughout the world. The global economy is simply unsustainable when so few have so much and so many have so little.
AMY GOODMAN: Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders speaking in July at a hearing he convened at the Hart Senate Office Building on the Greek debt crisis. On Thursday, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras announced his resignation, paving the way for new elections, in which Tsipras will run.
This is Democracy Now! When we come back, July is the hottest month on record. This year, so far, has been the hottest year in history. We’re going to talk about the links between climate change and the California drought. Stay with us.

The Greek debt is illegitimate, illegal and odious

The Greek debt is illegitimate, illegal and odious

The Commission for the Truth on the Greek debt made its preliminary report public on 17 and 18 June; the Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras and several other ministers were attending. The findings of the audit conducted by over thirty Greek and international experts, make it clear that this debt is indeed illegal, illegitimate and odious and that as such it should not be paid. Now the Greek government has to decide on its attitude towards creditors and on social policies to meet the humanitarian crisis the country is going through. Popular mobilizations are an essential element to drive the Greek government towards making sovereign decisions that protect the peoples. Demonstrations are taking place all over Europe for the "European week of support to the Greek people" from 20 to 26 June. All European citizens are directly concerned by what is happening in Greece. What is at stake is our ability to resist against a neoliberal Europe that uses debt as a weapon of mass destruction. 

In Spain, Manuela Carmena and Ada Colau being made mayors of the country’s two main cities last weekend is blatant confirmation of the new electoral strength of the left at the municipal elections of 24 May. Next to Madrid and Barcelona, Zaragosa, La Corogna, Valencia and Cadix will also have new mayors from left-wing citizens’ platforms. 

In Argentina, the International Conference on Debt, Commons, and Domination - Resistances and alternatives to build the Buen vivir organized by the Assembly for suspension of payment and debt audit, for the defence of national heritage and common goods on 3, 4 and 5 June met with great success. It brought together many TU, social and citizens movements, and the CADTM took an active part, proposing a national, continental, or even international campaign to demand suspension of payment and debt auditing to defend common goods and point to alternatives towards the "buen vivir" ("good living"). Links have already been established between the Commission for the Truth on the Greek debt and the Commission recently set up in Argentina. It is in this context that Eric Calcagno, President of the Commission for the audit of Argentine debt and Claudio Lozano, Argentine MP, attended the presentation of the preliminary report of the audit on the Greek debt in Athens on 17 and 18 June. 

Let’s all march together to demand the cancellation of the illegitimate Greek debt.

Welfare System Designed to Keep the Poor Poorer http://therealnews.com/

Bio

Sanford Schram is Professor of Political Science and Faculty Associate at the Roosevelt House Institute of Public Policy at Hunter College, CUNY. His published books include Words of Welfare: The Poverty of Social Science and the Social Science of Poverty (1995) and Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race (2011)--co-authored with Joe Soss and Richard Fording. Both books won the Michael Harrington Award from the American Political Science Association. (Schram is the only person to author more than one book that has won Harrington Award.) More recently he published Becoming a Footnote: An Activist-Scholar Finds His Voice, Learns to Write, and Survives Academia (2013). Soon to be published is The Return to Ordinary Capitalism: Neoliberalism, Precarity, Occupy (Oxford University Press). Schram is the 2012 recipient of the Charles McCoy Career Achievement Award from the Caucus for a New Political Science.

Transcript

Welfare System Designed to Keep the Poor PoorerSHARMINI PERIES, EXEC. PRODUCER, TRNN: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Sharmini Peries coming to you from Baltimore.
Governor of Kansas Sam Brownback has signed a new bill into state law that places restrictions on what welfare recipients can purchase with cash assistance, including movie tickets, liquor, and tattoos. Advocates of the bill say it will provide more accountability for taxpayer money, but will it actually improve the conditions of the poor? Now joining us to discuss this from New York is Sanford Schram. Sanford is professor of political science at Hunter College, CUNY. He is an award-winning author of many books, including Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism.
Thank you so much for joining us.
SANFORD SCHRAM, PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, HUNTER COLLEGE: My pleasure.
PERIES: Let's begin with what this bill will do, and how bills like this throughout the country is affecting the employment and well-being of welfare recipients.
SCHRAM: Yeah, the Kansas law is just one of another spate of laws that have been passed lately. The country seems to have a habit whenever things start to go bad or the economy's not doing well to fall into a pit of invoking stereotypes, often racist and sexist stereotypes about the poor as deviants who aren't adhering to white, middle-class rules of work and family. And amazingly, we've seen this happen again in the last few years post the great recession, and state after state has passed these kinds of restrictions which really don't make a lot of sense. A popular one is drug testing of recipients, though people on welfare are on average less likely to use illegal drugs than the population in general. And states lose money, they spend more on testing than they get back from dropping people from the rolls for that.
But we see these other kinds of restrictions coming in like the ones in Kansas, limiting how much money you can withdraw from your Electronic Benefit Transfer card each day, $25 in Kansas, and limiting what you can spend the money on. In many cases, about things that low-income people would never even contemplate buying or can afford to buy.
So it's really more about marking the poor as deviant, and sort of creating a kind of policy feedback that feeds back into the society. The policy sort of calls out the poor as deviant and manufacturers their otherness in order to reinforce or buttress anti-welfare antipathy.
PERIES: Now Sanford, what is there to be gained by marginalizing the poor more than they already are in our society? Particularly given that we are in economic crisis, it is well-established fact that unemployment and the economy is in a very slow growth period. What's the point in marginalizing the poor any more than they already are? What's in these heads of these people who passed this legislation in Kansas?
SCHRAM: Well I think there are multiple dimensions to it, but most concretely, materially, it's about not having to spend money, to avoid having to raise taxes. Since the welfare system was changed dramatically in 1996, where they instituted time limits, work requirements--
PERIES: This is important. This is not even under Reagan, this is under President Clinton, and at that time with the assistance of Hillary Clinton, who's now running for president.
SCHRAM: Yeah, there's been commentary lately that allegedly Hillary was very much in support of Bill's signing of the law. In many ways the Republicans, I think, backed Clinton into a corner and made him deliver on his promise when he had run for the presidency the first time, to end welfare as we know it. He ended up having to sign the law in part perhaps because he knew he was politically vulnerable with scandal hanging over him. He wasn't entirely happy with it, though in his autobiography he said he considered it his greatest achievement as president.
So it is bipartisan that we need to change the welfare system, make it more restrictive, to put more of the responsibility on the poor to be self-sufficient so they're not a burden on everyone else. And what's happened over time is so many people are not receiving public assistance that are eligible, we've gone back to the bad old days before the '60s and the welfare rights movement and the civil rights movement, when people were able to start to exercise their rights to assistance.
And now only about a third of all the people who are eligible for assistance are receiving it. So part of this is about keeping them at bay, and not having to meet our obligations as a society. So as the number of people who are extremely poor or live in deep poverty grows, and as the system doesn't respond, I think there's pressure to maintain the restrictions rather than confront the dire need that's rising all around us.
PERIES: What would you suggest or propose, since you study this area and must have solutions outlined. What are your recommendations in terms of short-term and long-term ways to address this kind of poverty?
SCHRAM: Yeah, it's really hard to overnight just overturn all of this. So I think we have to think more strategically and more incrementally, as taking steps along the way to get to a better place. And so we have a work-based system of social provision now. It's not just public assistance, cash assistance, or food stamps, and so on and so forth. But the earned income tax credit's actually our largest cash transfer program for the poor. And we subsidize people's wages. And in fact, it's getting to the point where states are worried that they're paying so much through cash assistance and food stamps to support low-wage employers, now post-great recession a lot of people are going back to work but they're still having to rely on food stamps and public assistance while they do that.
So one of the main things we could do is raise the minimum wage. And there is a lot of growing support for doing that, for more cities to try and follow Seattle and raise the minimum wage up so that one of the results of that will not only be lifting families out of poverty if we do that enough, but will be reducing their need to rely on public assistance, and it will reduce the extent to which the state will be paying to subsidize employers.
PERIES: Sanford, would that equalize--like at the moment, if your income doesn't reach a certain level, you have access to various tax credits and benefits. Especially if you're having a family. Now, if you raise the minimum wage, will some of those people become ineligible for some of those tax credits?
SCHRAM: Yeah. There are what are called notch effects. And so, and some people may be discouraged from working more because they're worried that their income would get too high and they lose their food stamps, and their earned income tax credit will be incrementally reduced as their earnings go up. But if we raise the minimum wage enough, that'll compensate for that.
When the earned income tax credit started to get expanded years ago, it was--there was a debate about whether it was going to discourage employers from raising wages because they would know that their wages that are being paid to their employees were going to be subsidized by the government. And I think there's more evidence of that now. And so there is a tension between the minimum wage law and the earned income tax credit, and we need to worry about their interaction. But I think the weight of the evidence now is that we should be massively raising the minimum wage, and there are instances where this is happening, now. Seattle being a precedent.
PERIES: And globally, the World Bank just recently declared that even worldwide, unions who were advocating on behalf of a higher wage for workers around the world was doing a good thing and should be included in some of the considerations for loans. So this is not just a U.S. phenomenon in terms of increasing the minimum wage, it appears to be a global trend.
SCHRAM: Right, and it's increasingly a global economy. And a lot of employers are concerned about global competitiveness. So I think it's important that we think about global responses.
PERIES: Thank you so much for joining us today, and giving us your insights into how this particular problem could be solved in our society.
SCHRAM: Thanks for talking to me. I appreciate it.
PERIES: And thank you for joining us on the Real News Network.

‘Stop Hiding Your Money offshore"

PPLI

As governments go Flat out to Hammer Tax Evasion and many banks are under severe pressure, Is PPLI the only remaining safe haven?


Switzerland has now agreed to start sharing financial information with the European Union. This sharing is on an automatic basis so European countries will receive the names, addresses, tax identification numbers and dates of birth of their residents with accounts in Swiss banks and they don’t even have to ask!
PPLI

‘Stop Hiding Your Money offshore, you Will get caught and When that happens, you Will be prosecuted’.

Deloitte have compiled data that shows Switzerland holds about $ 2 trillion of non residents money, closely followed by the UK with $1.7 trillion & and US with $1.4 trillion.

So where will the legal money go to maintain Privacy & Protection?

Recent years have seen the Introduction of the Private Placement Asset Protection Bond, a contract that provides the greatest level of protection and privacy that is legally possible:

  • Absolutely Private without any reporting requirements
  • Tax Advantaged, tax free in many countries.
  • Totally Compliant and Multi Jurisdictional
Mark O’Shea TEP, a Director of FTA in Cyprus had this to say about the process:
Mark V O'Shea TEP
 “We take the Legal benefits and Tax Advantages of a properly Constructed International Insurance Contract, merge it with the flexibility of Swiss Private Banking then cover it all with the Privacy and Protection provided by Luxembourg. We create the Ultimate in wealth management tools known as Private Banking Insurance or PPLI. There is absolutely no need to ‘hide’ money when we offer a perfectly legitimate and fully compliant contract to hold cash and other investments”.

  • More Secure and more flexible than an International Trust
  • Safer than a Bank, Bail In free with a proper capital guarantee

Greece: debt and memory of war (Conn Hallinan is a columnist for Foreign Policy In Focus.)

GermanbombingofPiraeus
Memory is selective and therein lies an explanation for some of the deep animosity between Berlin and Athens in the current debt crisis that has shaken the European Union (EU) to its foundations.
For German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble, "memory" goes back to 2007 when Greece was caught up in the worldwide financial conflagration touched off by American and European speculators. Berlin was a major donor in the 240 billion euro "bailout" - 89 percent of which went to pay off the gambling debts of German, French, Dutch and British banks. Schauble wants that debt repaid.
Millions of Greeks are concerned about unpaid debts as well, although their memories stretch back a little further.
In July 1943 Wehrmacht General Hubert Lanz, commander of the First Mountain Division, was annoyed because two of his officers had been threatened by civilians in the western Greek town of Kommeno. It was dangerous to irritate a German commander during the 1941-45 occupation of Greece.
Lanz first murdered 153 men, women and children - ages one to 75 - in Mousiotitsas, then surrounded Kommeno, where his troops systematically killed 317 people, including 172 women. Thirteen were one year old, and 38 people were burned alive in their houses. After the massacre, the soldiers ate their lunch in the village square, surrounded by the bodies of the dead, and then pushed on to other villages, killing more than 200 civilians.
It was not the first, nor the last massacre of Greeks, and most people in that country can recite them like the beads on a rosary: Kondomari (60 killed); Kardanos (180 killed); Alikianos (118 killed); Viannos (over 500 killed); Amari (164 killed); Kalavryta (over 700 killed); Distomo (214 killed). All in all, the Germans destroyed more than 460 villages, executed 130,000 civilians, and murdered virtually the entire Jewish population - 60,000 - during the occupation.
On top of that, Athens was forced to "lend" Germany 475 million reichsmarks - estimated today at 14 billion euros - to pay for the occupation. Adding interest to the loan makes that figure somewhere around 95 billion euros.
Greece's public debt is currently 315 billion euros.
The Greeks "remember" a few other things about those massacres. Gen. Kurtl Student, the butcher of Kondomari, Kardanos, and Alikianos, was sentenced to five years after the war, but got out early on medical grounds. The beast of Mousiotitsas and Kommeno, Gen. Lanz, was sentenced to 12 years, served three, and became a major military and security advisor to the German Free Democratic Party. In 1954 he wrote a book about his exploits and died in bed in 1982. Gen. Karl von Le Suire of Kalavryta fame was not so lucky. Captured by the Soviets, he died in a Stalingrad POW camp in 1954. Lt. Gen. Friedrich-Wilhelm Muller, who ordered the Viannos massacre, was tried and executed by the Greeks in 1947.
It is not hard to see why many Greeks see a certain relationship between what the Germans did to Greece during the occupation and what is being done to it today. There are no massacres - although suicide rates are through the ceiling - and no mass starvation, but 44 percent of the Greek people are now below the poverty line, the economy is shattered, and Greeks feel they no longer control their country. Up until the last election, they didn't. The Troika - the European Central Bank, the European Commission, and the International Monetary Fund - dictated the price of the loan: layoffs, wage and pension reductions, and huge cutbacks in health care. True, their occupiers did not wear the double thunderbolts of the SS or the field green of the Wehrmacht, but armies in pinstripes and silk ties can inflict a lot of damage.
Germany dismisses the Greek demand for reparations - estimated at anywhere from some 160 billion euros to over 677 billion euros - as a long-dead issue that was decided back in 1960 when the Greek government signed a Bilateral Agreement with Berlin and accepted 115 million deutschmarks in compensation.
"It is our firm belief that questions or reparations and compensation have been legally and politically resolved," said Steffen Seibert, a spokesperson for German Chancellor Angela Merkel. "We should concentrate on current issues and, hopefully what will be a good future."
But that is a selective reading of history. There was never any "resolution" of Nazi Germany's post-war debts because the country was divided between East and West. The 1953 Treaty of London cut Germany's obligations in half and stretched out debt payments, but the treaty did not address reparations because they were supposed to be resolved in the final peace treaty. However, with Germany divided, there was no such agreement.
When Germany was unified in 1990, the Greeks raised the issue of reparations, but the Germans dismissed the issue as resolved by the combination of the London Treaty and the 1960 payoff. But not according to historianHagen Fleischer, who has studied the reparations issue and the original loan documents. Fleischer says that Germany first argued that as long as the country was divided, Berlin could not consider repaying any debts. "Then after German reunification Helmut Kohl [then chancellor] and Hans-Dietrich Genscher [then foreign minister] said that it was now much too late. The matter was ancient history."
According to the Syriza government, the 115 million marks Germany paid in 1960 were only in compensation for Greek victims of Nazism, not the physical damage to the country, the destruction of the economy, or the forced loans.
"Germany has never properly paid reparations for the damage done to Greece," argues Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras. "After the reunification of Germany in 1990 the legal and political conditions were created for this issue to be solved. But since then, German governments chose silence, legal tricks and delay."
Many Greeks refuse to accept what they consider a paltry sum for the vast crimes of the occupation. Four descendents of the 214 civilians massacred by the 4th SS Panzergrenadier Division at Distomo sued and, in 1997, were awarded 37.5 million euros, a ruling upheld by the Greek Supreme Court in 2000. When Germany refused to recognize the verdict, the defendants took their case to Italy, and in 2008 an Italian court ruled that the plaintiffs had the right to seize German-owned property in compensation for the Greek award, including a villa on Lake Como.
Germany appealed the Italian decision to the International Court at Hague, which found in favor of Berlin on a principle of international law that countries are immune from the jurisdiction of other states.
However, Germany has assets in Greece, including property and the Goethe Institute, a leading cultural center in Athens. Justice Minister Nikos Paraskevopoulos says he is ready to begin seizing German assets in Greece.
Tsipras says Germany has a "moral obligation" to pay reparations, a sentiment that some on the German left agree with. "From a moral point of view, Germany ought to pay off these old compensations and the 'war loan' that they got during the Occupation," says Gabriele Zimmer of Die Linke, a party closely allied to Syriza in the European Parliament.
Addressing the Greek Parliamentary Committee for Claiming the German Reparations on March 10, Tsipras asked, "Why do we tackle the past" instead of focusing on the future? "But what country, what people can have a future if it does not honor its history and its struggles?"
Dismissing the argument that reparations are ancient history - "The generation of the Occupation and the National Resistance is still living" - Tsipras warned about the consequences of amnesia: "The crimes and destruction caused by the troops of the Third Reich, across the Greek territory, but also across the entire Europe" are memories "that must be preserved in the younger generations. We have a duty - historical, political, ethical - to preserve, remember forever what Nazism means, what fascism means."
Nazism is not a memory that needs a lot of refreshing in Greece. Sometime this spring some 70 members of the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn Party, including 16 current and former Parliament members, will go on trial for being members of a "criminal organization." The anti-Semitic and racist Golden Dawn Party has been associated with several murders, attacks on leftists, trade unionists, and immigrants, and has close ties with the police and several of the billionaire oligarchs who dominate Greek politics and the economy.
Indeed, its profile is eerily similar to that of the German National Socialist (Nazi) Party in its early years. Golden Dawn has 17 members of Parliament and is the third highest vote getter in the country, though its support has recently dipped.
Old memories certainly fuel Greek anger at Germany, but so do the current policies of enforced austerity that Berlin has played a pivotal role in inflicting on debt-ravaged Greece. "Germany's Europe has finished," says Greek Social Security Minister Dimitris Statoulis, the Europe "where Germany forbids and all other countries execute orders."
Thanks to Kia Mistilis, journalist, photographer and editor, for providing material for this column.
This article originally appeared at Conn Hallinan's blog, Dispatches From the Edge.
Photo: Damage from the German bombing of Piraeus, Greece, on April 6, 1941. Australian War Memorial Image/Wikimedia

Health Tragedy in Greece


Osservatorio Italiano sulla Salute Globale

As doctors and citizens, we have the obligation to respond and to advocate for the protection of health and health care. As a consequence, we cannot ignore the fact that the health of people in Greece has worsened to unacceptable levels. The statistics are appalling and clearly show that the collapse of the Greek economy and of its health system, and the impoverishment of people,  is hitting the most vulnerable and those who cannot be held responsible for the crisis. Children are dying; according to the prestigious medical journal Lancet, infant mortality went up by 43% between 2008 and 2010, while the rate of low birth weight increased by 19%, due to the reduction of antenatal care and the consequent worsening of maternal health. Medicines are in short supply, HIV steps up again, life expectancy goes down.

We cannot keep quiet; we must speak up and clearly state that people’s health comes first. Greek citizen must be defended, protected, treated, rehabilitated, cured, for a society that grows healthy.

We call for the highest priority to wariness and action upon the current health tragedy in the ongoing negotiations between the Greek government and the EU institutions. We urge that the former be given the possibility to act for the recovery of fundamental rights, such as the right to health, as promised to and wished by the Greek people.

We refer also to article 35 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, ratified by all the Member States, when it states that:

“A high level of human health protection shall be ensured in the definition and implementation of all the Union's policies and activities.”

Italian Global Health Watch

March 10, 2015


Students Launch Historic Debt Strike, Refusing to Pay Back Predatory College Loans (Democracy now)

Students and activists are taking direct action over what some have called the nation’s next financial crisis: the more than $1.2 trillion in student loan debt. The massive cost of U.S. college tuition has saddled millions with crushing debt and priced many others out of the classroom. Now, 15 former students of the for-profit Corinthian Colleges system have launched what they say is the nation’s first student debt strike. The students have refused to pay back loans they took out to attend Corinthian, which has been sued by the federal government for its predatory lending. Meanwhile, another activist group has announced it has erased some $13 million of debt owed by students of Everest College, a Corinthian subsidiary. The Rolling Jubilee uses donated funds to purchase debt at discounted prices, then abolish it. We are joined by two guests: Laura Hanna, a filmmaker and activist who helped launch Strike Debt’s Rolling Jubilee initiative, and Latonya Suggs, a student debt striker in the "Corinthian 15" who is $63,000 in debt after completing a two-year program in criminal justice at Everest College.

Give Greece a chance … By Felipe Van Keirsbilck (Alter Summit)

Alter Summit Newsletter - February 2015
Editorial
Give Greece a chance …
By Felipe Van Keirsbilck (Alter Summit)
The spectacular results of the Greek elections on January 25 provoke millions of comments: each announcement, each incident, each manœuvre of the ECB to put pressure on governments shake up the media and the social networks.

Alter Summit and its affiliated organisations observe the events from further away, but at the same time with an involvement which brings them closer to them.

First the distance: it stems from the fact that our common basis, between more than 100 organisations in 20 countries, can be summarized in a very simple question: how are we going to put a spanner in the wheels of austerity policies? Or, in other words, how are we going to stop European governments to persevere in their policy of austerity?

From the basis which has brought us together for nearly 3 years, the political situation in Greece brings about two essential questions (which will be debated at the Alter Summit assembly next 5th and 6th of March):
  • Does the arrival of an anti-austerity government in one (single) country constitute a sufficient event? How can this country confront the Europe of austerity?
  • What is the role Greek and European social networks are playing in this new situation?
But the reflection we have been having for two years is not that of a group of “experts”, because our involvement is very real!

18 months ago, there were 2000 of us in Athens demanding a social, ecological, egalitarian and democratic Europe. If needs be, we shall go back to Athens to express our political and material solidarity with a nation having had the courage to vote against the program lines of Brussels and Frankfurt.

Whatever happens with political shenanigans and negotiations, this nation deserves to be given a chance to change direction. We will be by its side!

/Syriza-and-Podemos-are-a-reaction-against-the-neoliberal-assault-strangling-peripheral-countries



 Interview of Noam Chomsky to Miguel Mora   It has been snowing in Boston and the mercury is down at -15ºC; the buses aren’t running and cars skid. At 11am on the dot, Professor Emeritus Noam Chomsky, the 86-year-old linguist and philosopher, is at his post, giving an interview to a French journalist in his office at the MIT Department of Linguistics.

We are inside the legendary Stata Center, built by Frank Gehry in steel and brick. The Computer, Information and Intelligence Sciences faculty is packed with students, an overwhelming number of whom are Asians. Tucked in next to a lift on the eighth floor, Chomsky’s lair smells of freshly made coffee, a sense of calm and camaraderie. 

Next door to Chomsky’s office is that of the nonagenarian Morris Halle, a diminutive bearded man with a glint in his eye, crumbs down his jacket and the look of someone who has shared vodka and revolutions with Bakunin. The New Yorker has compared the pair of linguists to Dante and Virgil, or Sherlock Holmes and Watson.

It was Halle, an illustrious linguist, who brought Chomsky to the MIT in 1955, when no one else dared to hire the brilliant and angry young Jew, fresh from his Harvard doctorate. In 1968 the two joined forces to write the most important book in the history of linguistics, The Sound Pattern of English, which did for phonology –the study of the sound of words- what Chomsky had already done –at the age of 29- for syntax: converting it into a science.

Another key character in Chomsky’s life is his secretary, Bev Stohl, a charming woman who jokingly says of her venerable maestros in an aside: “They’re they are; over 200 years between them”. Chomsky’s spacious and light office, lined with books on anarchy, war, history and linguistics, is dominated by two large photographs of Bertrand Russell, an idol and guide to the atheist and pacifistic thinker. Chomsky receives his second interviewer of the day with a welcoming smile. It is soon clear that he has lost some of his energy and hearing, and his voice is faint. But listening to him is still quite an experience; having embraced all the just and lost causes there are, the conscience of Yankee imperialism is still an incurable Quixote and a shrewd analyst. He retains a prodigious memory for dates, facts, books and speeches, while not once losing his train of thought. His mind remains clear, agile and powerful.

As well as teaching, writing articles and attending to his students, Chomsky is still a guest speaker at conferences – “my diary is full through 2016”, he says – and he replies in person to the dozens of messages and letters he receives every day. According to his secretary, “the man never says no; he just doesn’t know how”. The ultimate proof of this comes after the 45 minutes of the interview have elapsed, when this journalist asks him to be honorary president of CTXT’s editorial board. Chomsky answers: “Well, I don’t join boards… But if it’s honorary, I could!”

You look cheerful. Do you still find reasons to be optimistic?

Well, there are a few. Although there is no lack of reasons to be pessimistic. Humans have to make a decision, and not in the long term, as to whether to survive or just abandon their two huge and imminent threats: one is environmental catastrophes; the other is nuclear war. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which has been the main monitor of strategic and nuclear issues for many years, has a famous doomsday clock. They determine how far the minute hand should be from midnight. Now they just moved it two minutes closer, so it is now three minutes to midnight. That’s the closest it has been since the Cuban Missile Crisis. The threat of nuclear war is increasing; it’s always been significant and it’s kind of a miracle that we have escaped it if you look at the record. The United States, for example, now devotes about a trillion dollars to the modernization and upgrading of nuclear weapons. The Non-proliferation Treaty, if anybody cares, commits us to eliminating them, to show good faith in our efforts to eliminate them. Russia is doing something similar, and others are doing the same, including smaller powers.

But hardly anybody talks about this.

Nobody is talking much about that, except strategic analysts, economic experts and others who are concerned about these things. But there are very serious threats. One is the conflict in Ukraine. One hopes that the powers will back away, but it’s far from guaranteed; we know they’ve come close before. Just to take one example, in the early 1980s the Reagan Administration decided to probe Russian defenses. So they simulated air and naval attacks against Russia, including nuclear weapons. They didn’t tell the Russians what they were doing because they wanted to provoke a real alert, not a simulation. It was a moment of extreme tension. Reagan had just announced strategic defense initiatives, like Star Wars, which analysts on all sides understood to be a first-strike weapon. If it ever works, it wouldn’t be a missile defense, but rather a protection for a first strike. As Russian archives have been released, US intelligence now recognizes that the threat was extremely severe. In fact, one intelligence analysis that just appeared recently said that we came close to war.

So it’s pure luck that we’re still here.

I’m going back to your first question… Optimism? It’s always the same story. Always, no matter how you evaluate what’s happening in the world, you, basically, have two choices: you can decide to be pessimistic and say there’s no hope and abandon all efforts – in which case you contribute to ensuring that the worst will happen; or you can grasp whatever hopes there are - and they’re always there - and try to do what you can. And maybe you’ll be able to avert disaster, or even go a little way toward a better world.

You revolutionized linguistics when you were 29 years old and then you tried to change the world. And you’re still trying. I imagine the second task has been much harder than the first. Has it been worth it?

Changing linguistics is pretty hard. Linguistics includes a bit of science and aspects of contemporary philosophy… I think I have been on the right side of things, even though I’m part of a small minority. 

Would you say the overall result has been positive?

There have been successes, not just mine, but thanks to popular opposition to violence, aggression and inequality. If you take the Civil Rights Movement in the US – in which I was not a leading figure but I was involved like many others – it achieved certain significant goals, but by no means all of those that were contemplated. Take, say, Martin Luther King: if you listen to the official rhetoric, his fight stops in 1963 with his famous I have a dream speech leading down to the Civil Rights legislation, which did significantly improve voting rights and other rights in the South. But King didn’t stop at that point. He went on to try to address Northern racism and to create a movement for the poor, not just blacks, but the poor in general. He was assassinated in Memphis (Tennessee) when he was there to support a strike of public workers. His wife, his widow, led the march through the South, through all the places where the confrontations had been, got to Washington and they sat up a tent city, Resurrection City. The Congress of that time was the most liberal in history. They allowed it to stay there for a while, but then they sent the police in in the middle of the night and smashed it up and threw everybody out of town. That was the end of the movement to deal with poverty.
Europe is now immersed in its darkest chapter of the past 50 years.

There have been significant gains but they come up against a barrier. And that barrier then got much worse with the initiation of this massive neoliberal assault against the world’s population, which began in the late 1970s and took off under Reagan and Thatcher. Now Europe is one of the worst victims with these economically crazy policies of austerity under recession. Even the IMF says that makes no sense. But it makes sense from another point of view: they are undermining the Welfare State; they are weakening labor; they are increasing the power of the wealthy and the privileged. So you can see in their failure there is a success that happens to be destroying societies. But that’s kind of the footnote that you disregard when you are sitting in the offices of the Bundesbank.

Society have started to react to this situation. Do you think change is possible?

There is now a resistance to the neoliberal attack, a very significant one in fact. The most important is actually in South America, which is dramatic. I mean, for 500 years, South America had been pretty much under the domination of Western imperial powers, most recently the US. But in the last 10 or 15 years it has begun to break out of that. That’s an event with stark significance. Latin America was one of the most loyal adherents to the Washington consensus and the official rules.
The backyard…
But Latin Americans have pulled out of it; not totally, but for the first time in half a millennium, the countries are moving towards integration, which is a prerequisite for independence. They had been very much separated in the past and they’re beginning to unite. One symbol is that the US has lost all of its military bases in Latin America, with the last one being closed in Ecuador. Another striking illustration is what’s happening in the hemisphere conferences. The last conference, which was in Colombia, never reached a consensus and they could not produce a declaration. The reason was there were two countries who opposed the rest of the hemisphere: the US and Canada. Nothing like that was imaginable in the past.

Guantánamo is still an issue. Do you think Cuba will try to get the base back in the Havana talks?

I’m sure the Cubans will try but I doubt the Americans would commit to that.
I read a recent article where you said that Obama is only a liberal-conservative, a moderate Republican and that Nixon’s administration was the most liberal in US history.
Nixon was a nice guy… The standard has changed. By today’s standards, Nixon looks like a liberal, and Eisenhower looks like a flaming radical. Eisenhower, after all, stated that anyone who would ever question the New Deal legislation as crazy could never be part of the American political system. By now, most of this is gone.

So Obama is not a left-wing president?

The term left in the US is now used for moderates from the center because the spectrum has shifted. In fact, there used to be a joke that the US is a one-party state (Business Party) with two factions (Democrats and Republicans), which was pretty accurate. Now it’s not accurate anymore. It’s still a one-party state but there’s just one faction: moderate Republicans. That’s the only functioning political party. There are those who are called Democrats but they are pretty much what moderate Republicans used to be. The other party, the Republicans, has just drifted way off this background. They have abandoned any pretense of being a parliamentary party. Actually, this is recognized. One of the most respected conservative commentators, Norman Ornstein, recently described the Republicans as a radical insurgency which has abandoned any pretext of participating in parliamentary politics.

What are the neocons up to these days?

The party has been mobilized to seize two objectives: one, to destroy the country and make it look as if it is the fault of the democrats so maybe they can get into power again. The other is just to serve the rich and the powerful with dedication. But since you can’t make that your party platform, what they’ve done is understandable; to try to mobilize big sectors of the population that were always there but were never really organized as a major political force. One group are Evangelical Christians, who are a huge part of the population in the US. That’s why you have the new chairman of the Senate Committee on the Environment, James Inhofe, a man who says: “It’s arrogant to claim that humans can do anything about God’s will, as in global warming”. This is antediluvian… you can’t even call it Stone Age because primitive people knew way better than that. But this is the head of the environment committee… And this is part of the essence of the Republican base, which is substantially, maybe quite substantially, extremist, evangelical Christian-right. The other sector that they have mobilized is people who are terrified. The United States of course is a very mixed society, and by now what is happening is that the white population is becoming a minority. So, there is a large sector of the population and their political leaders which says “they are stealing our country from us”. That’s a way of saying there are too many dark faces; you know, mainly Hispanics.

And what about Muslims?

Muslims too, but Hispanics are the main source of fear.
The national myth against the onslaught of “inferior” races…
It’s still there. It may have no basis in the history or biology, but it’s in the consciousness. And now you are at the point where our Anglo-Saxon mythological heritage is not only threatened, but is being overtaken by these outsiders who are taking our country away from us. All of this is part of what the Republican Party - I have to call it the former Republican Party – has used as a basis that leads to these policies which are virtually insane.
Europe is not so far away from this vision.
Again it’s insane the way the Troika is taking decisions in Europe. Well, it’s only insane if you consider the human consequences, but not from the point of view of those who are designing the policy as they are doing fine. They are richer and more powerful than ever and destroying their enemies, in other words the general population.
The Finnish filmmaker Aki Kaurismäki calls it sadistic capitalism.
Well, you know, capitalism is inherently sadistic; actually Adam Smith recognized that when it is unleashed and freed from external constraints, its sadistic nature shows itself because it is inherently savage. What is capitalism? It means try to maximize your own personal gain at the expense of everyone else. Actually, one famous Nobel Prize-winning economist, James Buchanan, once said that each human being’s ideal is to be a master with everyone else his slave; that’s our ideal situation. And from the point of view of neoclassical economics, why not? That’s the ideal.
A world without rights or responsibilities?
A word with no rules and where the powerful get what they want. And by some miracle, everything is going to work out fine. It is interesting that Adam Smith faced this with the famous phrase “invisible hand”, which everyone throws around today. (…) Now we see that when capital is unleashed from regulation, particularly financial markets, of course everything blows up. That is what Europe is now facing.

Surprisingly, 25 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, a leftist party like Syriza has won an election in Europe. It is as if the Troika’s policies have brought the old enemy back from the dead…
I don’t really see it that way... For one thing, there is a lot of mythology about the enemy. Russia was more remote from socialism than the United States is; the Bolshevik revolution was a major defeat for socialism; it undermined the socialist movement and it led to autocratic tyranny in which the working people were basically what Lenin called a proletarian army under the control of a leader who had nothing to do with socialism.

Isn’t Syriza a sign that history’s pendulum is swinging back?

Syriza is by today’s standards a left party, but not particularly because of its programs. It’s an anti-neoliberal party. They are not calling for workers’ control of industry.

Of course, they are not real revolutionaries.

They are not even traditional socialists. That’s not a criticism; I think it is a good thing, and the same with Podemos, which basically is a party that’s rising up against the neoliberal assault, which is strangling and destroying the peripheral countries.

Let’s talk about the press. You have been a harsh critic of The New York Times and The New Yorker in two recent articles. Is the decline of traditional newspapers due to how close they are to power or, as their editors argue, is it internet’s fault?

I write about The New York Times and The New Yorker because what interests me is the kind of liberal extreme. I mean, I’ll let somebody else denounce Fox news, which is a joke. But what is interesting to me are the intellectual journals at the outer limits of acceptable criticism. They are kind of guardians. They say: you can go this far, but no further. And they are there for a particular interest. Doctrinally, I don’t think they have changed, so they were just as protective of state power all the way back. Take a look at the invasion and the overthrow of democracy in Guatemala, strongly supported; the overthrow of the Iranian parliamentary system in 1953, very strongly supported; the Vietnam War, strong support all the way through. In fact, about the only criticism over the Vietnam War up until the present time is that it failed. When Obama is considered a great moral hero because he opposed the invasion of Iraq, what did it say? It said it was a blunder, you know, it didn’t work out. If it had worked out, that’d be fine…

Guardians of power, but not of democracy…?

The press is in a very serious decline but I think it is basically the commercial markets operating. The media is basically made up of big corporations and, essentially, they live on advertising, and their sources of capital are simply diffusing, so the press is declining. So if you take, say,The Boston Globe, it used to be quite a good newspaper; one of the best in the country. But now it basically has no independent news at all. It either runs wire services or it picks up something from The New York Times and it has very few correspondents. And that’s happening in all of the country. That’s not a doctrinal manner; it has to do with the functioning of the market society; if you don’t make enough money, you decline. 

And isn´t it strange that these media outlets continue to defend a model which has led them to ruin?

Doctrinally, overwhelmingly, and not just in the United States, they simply support power. In the United States that’s business and state power. There are deviations. In fact, The Wall Street Journal, the primary business paper, runs exposures of corporate crime, good ones in fact. It’s not like it’s a fascist state. - See more at: http://www.stokokkino.gr/details_en.php?id=1000000000004463/Syriza-and-Podemos-are-a-reaction-against-the-neoliberal-assault-strangling-peripheral-countries#sthash.KonNcJSV.dpuf